Conservation laws in non-inertial frames and non-conservation of energy of relative motion in two-body problem

TL;DR

This paper examines the effects of non-inertial reference frames on the conservation laws in two-body gravitational systems, proposing a more consistent definition of indirect acceleration and clarifying energy non-conservation.

Contribution

It introduces a physically motivated definition of indirect acceleration that is consistent across all objects and clarifies the non-conservation of energy and momentum in non-inertial frames.

Findings

Indirect acceleration is the same for all objects in the system.

Energy of relative motion is not conserved due to work by indirect forces.

Vis viva integral should not be interpreted as energy conservation in non-inertial frames.

Abstract

The dynamics of systems of multiple gravitationally interacting bodies is often studied in a frame attached to one of the objects (e.g. a central star in a planetary system). As this frame is generally non-inertial, indirect forces appear in the equations describing the motion of bodies relative to the reference object. According to the convention adopted in celestial mechanics, the associated indirect acceleration is defined to be different for every object under consideration, whereas the gravitational coupling between each body and the reference object is described via the effective two-body potential, which does not obey the equivalence principle. Here we point out that a slightly different and more physically motivated definition of the indirect acceleration provides significant benefits when interpreting relative motion in a non-inertial frame. First, the indirect acceleration ends up being the same for all objects in the system. Second, the non-conservation of momentum, angular momentum, and energy of the whole system in a non-inertial frame naturally follow from the action of the indirect acceleration on the system as an external force. We also argue that the vis viva integral of the classical two-body problem should not be interpreted as a statement of energy conservation in a non-inertial frame attached to one of the bodies. The energy of relative motion is not conserved in this frame due to the work done on the two-body system by the indirect force. These results can be useful for interpreting dynamics in various astrophysical contexts, in particular the physics of disc-planet coupling.