Where did you get that? Towards Summarization Attribution for Analysts
Violet B, John M. Conroy, Sean Lynch, Danielle M, Neil P. Molino, Aaron Wiechmann, and Julia S. Yang

TL;DR
This paper investigates automatic attribution methods for summaries, linking sentences to source texts, and proposes a hybrid summarization approach to improve attribution accuracy, along with analyzing attribution errors.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid summarization technique for better attribution and a custom topology to categorize attribution errors, advancing automatic attribution methods.
Findings
Hybrid summarization aids attribution clarity
Custom topology effectively categorizes attribution errors
Proposed methods improve attribution accuracy
Abstract
Analysts require attribution, as nothing can be reported without knowing the source of the information. In this paper, we will focus on automatic methods for attribution, linking each sentence in the summary to a portion of the source text, which may be in one or more documents. We explore using a hybrid summarization, i.e., an automatic paraphrase of an extractive summary, to ease attribution. We also use a custom topology to identify the proportion of different categories of attribution-related errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
