Euclid preparation: LXXXVII. Non-Gaussianity of 2-point statistics likelihood: Precise analysis of the matter power spectrum distribution
Euclid Collaboration, J. Bel, S. Gouyou Beauchamps, P. Baratta, L. Blot, C. Carbone, P.-S. Corasaniti, E. Sefusatti, S. Escoffier, W. Gillard, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, P. Battaglia, A. Biviano, E. Branchini, M. Brescia

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the non-Gaussian features of the matter power spectrum distribution using extensive simulations and an analytical framework, highlighting deviations from Gaussianity on nonlinear scales relevant for Euclid.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analytical approach linking non-Gaussianity to higher-order statistics and assesses survey geometry effects on the power spectrum likelihood.
Findings
Likelihood deviates from Gaussian on nonlinear scales, especially at low redshift.
Pentaspectrum dominates non-Gaussianity at intermediate scales.
Survey geometry and integral constraint increase skewness in measurements.
Abstract
We investigate the non-Gaussian features in the distribution of the matter power spectrum multipoles. Using the COVMOS method, we generate 100\,000 mock realisations of dark matter density fields in both real and redshift space across multiple redshifts and cosmological models. We derive an analytical framework linking the non-Gaussianity of the power spectrum distribution to higher-order statistics of the density field, including the trispectrum and pentaspectrum. We explore the effect of redshift-space distortions, the geometry of the survey, the Fourier binning, the integral constraint, and the shot noise on the skewness of the distribution of the power spectrum measurements. Our results demonstrate that the likelihood of the estimated matter power spectrum deviates significantly from a Gaussian assumption on nonlinear scales, particularly at low redshift. This departure is primarily…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
