Improving Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural Simulators via Hamiltonian Dynamics
Tai Hoang, Alessandro Trenta, Alessio Gravina, Niklas Freymuth, Philipp Becker, Davide Bacciu, Gerhard Neumann

TL;DR
This paper introduces IGNS, a Hamiltonian-based graph neural simulator that effectively captures long-range interactions and reduces error accumulation in simulating complex physical systems.
Contribution
We propose a novel Hamiltonian-based graph neural simulator, IGNS, with features like information preservation, port-Hamiltonian extension, and specialized training for improved long-range interaction modeling.
Findings
IGNS outperforms existing GNSs in accuracy and stability.
The model effectively captures long-range dependencies.
It demonstrates robustness in complex dynamical systems.
Abstract
Learning to simulate complex physical systems from data has emerged as a promising way to overcome the limitations of traditional numerical solvers, which often require prohibitive computational costs for high-fidelity solutions. Recent Graph Neural Simulators (GNSs) accelerate simulations by learning dynamics on graph-structured data, yet often struggle to capture long-range interactions and suffer from error accumulation under autoregressive rollouts. To address these challenges, we propose Information-preserving Graph Neural Simulators (IGNS), a graph-based neural simulator built on the principles of Hamiltonian dynamics. This structure guarantees preservation of information across the graph, while extending to port-Hamiltonian systems allows the model to capture a broader class of dynamics, including non-conservative effects. IGNS further incorporates a warmup phase to initialize…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
* novelty in introducing a port-Hamiltonian formalism to graph simulators * theoretical proofs of universality and non-vanishing gradients * data efficiency, importance of warm-up steps and length of confident prediction horizon were investigated * code attached
* the advantages of Hamiltonian dynamics simulation were not properly studied (like the energy conservation for the conservative systems) * the generalizability is under question * the file dataset.zip in supplimentary link is corrupt * the paper lacks qualitative discussion of the distinction between two versions of the algorithm is not clear (IGNS, IGNS_ti (time-independent))
1. The idea is novel and interesting. 2. The paper has solid theoretical foundations (universality, non-vanishing gradients) and robust experimental design against many strong baselines across different physical systems. 3. The paper is generally well-written, logically structured, with clear problem statements and architecture descriptions. Good use of figures, tables, and appendices. 4. It offers a substantial advancement in GNSs by solving critical long-standing limitations.
1. A direct ablation for authors' static geometric encoding feels like missed. The authors make an argument that model's specific geometric encoding helps avoid "overfitting," which is important for generalizing well. However, authors don't really show us an experiment where they directly compare their own model with and without developed static encoding. Instead, they rely an indirect comparison to other architectures. 2. No inference time analysis. It it is hard to understand, beyond just trai
- The universality result (although I do not fully understand the proof yet) is novel. - Proposal of new tasks, specifically designed to test long-range propagation and oscillatory dynamics under external forcing.
**Over-claimed assertions:** - A sentence starting at line 290 regarding Theorem 1 is over-claiming. Being with/without compact supports makes a huge difference in the significance. - The multi-step objective is a pretty common loss function for training auto-regressive models. The authors need to cite relevant papers or argue that this is a pretty common approach. The use of symplectic integrator in this context is also not novel. - Theorem 2 is almost identical to a sensitivity result in [1],
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Materials Science
