Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring
Wenhao Xu, Akshatha Arodi, Jian-Yun Nie, Arsene Fansi Tchango

TL;DR
This paper introduces a rule-based AI framework for monitoring modern slavery statements, ensuring compliance assessments are transparent, verifiable, and aligned with legal standards, addressing limitations of existing LLM applications.
Contribution
It presents the Compliance Alignment Judge and CALLM, novel AI components that produce rule-consistent, transparent outputs for legal compliance verification of slavery disclosures.
Findings
CALLM improves compliance prediction accuracy
Outputs are transparent and legally grounded
Framework enables expert oversight and verification
Abstract
Modern slavery affects millions of people worldwide, and regulatory frameworks such as Modern Slavery Acts now require companies to publish detailed disclosures. However, these statements are often vague and inconsistent, making manual review time-consuming and difficult to scale. While NLP offers a promising path forward, high-stakes compliance tasks require more than accurate classification: they demand transparent, rule-aligned outputs that legal experts can verify. Existing applications of large language models (LLMs) often reduce complex regulatory assessments to binary decisions, lacking the necessary structure for robust legal scrutiny. We argue that compliance verification is fundamentally a rule-matching problem: it requires evaluating whether textual statements adhere to well-defined regulatory rules. To this end, we propose a novel framework that harnesses AI for rule-level…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
