Eventual Capture on a Measurable Cardinal
Tom Benhamou, Corey Bacal Switzer

TL;DR
This paper investigates localization cardinals at measurable cardinals, showing they trivialize in that context, and establishes new consistency results and relations among these and other cardinal invariants.
Contribution
It proves that localization cardinals trivialize at measurable cardinals and constructs models with diverse values for these invariants, answering open questions.
Findings
Localization cardinals trivialize at measurable cardinals.
Constructs models with different values of _h(\u220a^*) and _h(^*) at measurable cardinals.
Establishes relations between localization cardinals and other cardinal invariants.
Abstract
We continue the study from \cite{BrendleFreidmanMontoya, vandervlugtlocalizationcardinals} of localization cardinals and and their variants at regular uncountable . We prove that if is measurable then these cardinals trivialize. We also provide other fundamental restrictions in the most general setting. We prove the results are optimal by forcing different values for at a measurable. As a by-product, we prove the consistency of for functions , thus answering a question of Brendle, Brooke-Taylor, Friedman and Montoya. Moreover, we study the relation between these cardinals and other well-known cardinal invariants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
