Learning Biomolecular Motion: The Physics-Informed Machine Learning Paradigm
Aaryesh Deshpande

TL;DR
This paper reviews how physics-informed machine learning integrates data and physical laws to improve biomolecular modeling, addressing long-standing challenges in kinetics, rare events, and free-energy estimation.
Contribution
It surveys recent advances in physics-informed neural networks and operator learning, highlighting their potential to solve the biomolecular closure problem with mechanistic interpretability.
Findings
Enhanced modeling of long-timescale kinetics
Improved estimation of rare events and free energy
Frameworks that combine data-driven inference with physical constraints
Abstract
The convergence of statistical learning and molecular physics is transforming our approach to modeling biomolecular systems. Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) offers a systematic framework that integrates data-driven inference with physical constraints, resulting in models that are accurate, mechanistic, generalizable, and able to extrapolate beyond observed domains. This review surveys recent advances in physics-informed neural networks and operator learning, differentiable molecular simulation, and hybrid physics-ML potentials, with emphasis on long-timescale kinetics, rare events, and free-energy estimation. We frame these approaches as solutions to the "biomolecular closure problem", recovering unresolved interactions beyond classical force fields while preserving thermodynamic consistency and mechanistic interpretability. We examine theoretical foundations, tools and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Protein Structure and Dynamics
