TL;DR
This paper develops a framework for designing AI incident reporting systems, emphasizing institutional considerations and analyzing case studies to guide policymakers and researchers.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework with seven dimensions for AI incident reporting system design, informed by case studies and policy analysis.
Findings
Seven key dimensions for incident reporting system design.
Insights from nine case studies across safety-critical industries.
Guidelines for policymakers on appropriate design choices.
Abstract
We introduce a conceptual framework and provide considerations for the institutional design of AI incident reporting systems, i.e., processes for collecting information about safety- and rights-related events caused by general-purpose AI. As general-purpose AI systems are increasingly adopted, they are causing more real-world harms and displaying the potential to cause significantly more dangerous incidents - events that did or could have caused harm to individuals, property, or the environment. Through a literature review, we develop a framework for understanding the institutional design of AI incident reporting systems, which includes seven dimensions: policy goal, actors submitting and receiving reports, type of incidents reported, level of risk materialization, enforcement of reporting, anonymity of reporters, and post-reporting actions. We then examine nine case studies of incident…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
