Communication-Efficient Decentralized Optimization via Double-Communication Symmetric ADMM
Jinrui Huang, Xueqin Wang, Dong Liu, Jingguo Lan, Runxiong Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel decentralized symmetric ADMM algorithm that enhances communication efficiency by incorporating multiple communication rounds per iteration, reducing total communication cost while maintaining linear convergence.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new decentralized symmetric ADMM with multiple communication rounds, improving communication efficiency and convergence in networked optimization without a central coordinator.
Findings
Achieves linear convergence under weak assumptions.
Reduces total communication cost compared to existing methods.
Validated through experiments on regression and classification tasks.
Abstract
This paper focuses on decentralized composite optimization over networks without a central coordinator. We propose a novel decentralized symmetric ADMM algorithm that incorporates multiple communication rounds within each iteration, derived from a new constraint formulation that enables information exchange beyond immediate neighbors. While increasing per-iteration communication, our approach significantly reduces the total number of iterations and overall com- munication cost. We further design optimal communication rules that minimize the number of rounds and variables transmitted per iteration. The proposed algorithm is shown to achieve linear convergence under standard and relatively weak assumptions (e.g., metric subregularity). Extensive experiments on regression and classification tasks validate the theoretical results and demonstrate superior performance compared to existing…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
(+) The constraint design is an elegant way to bake two-hop information flow into the constraints themselves. This makes the need for two communications per iteration principled rather than an ad-hoc multi-consensus loop. To my knowledge this particular symmetric, two-block dual realization of decentralized ADMM is novel. (+) The communication scheduling -- transmitting two surrogates rather than two primals -- is thoughtfully engineered so each block enables the other block's update with minim
(-) Counting "rounds" alone does not equal communication volume here because DS-ADMM transmits two d-vectors per round (four per iteration). Baselines often send a single d-vector per round. A better comparison should report total scalars (or bytes) transmitted per agent to reach a target accuracy. Without this "net communication reduction" claim is not fully substantiated.
Due to weaknesses, I can not highlight any substantial strengths of the paper
It is stated that > To our knowledge, this is the first decentralized optimization framework that achieves a net reduction in total communication by leveraging fixed multi-round communication within each iteration. but multi-round schemes showed communication acceleration in Scaman et al., 2017 and Ye et al., 2023, so the contribution is unclear to me. There is no theoretical complexity comparison with SOTA decentralized optimization algorithms such as Mudag or even Symmetric ADMM, from which
The auxiliary constraint embedding (Prop 2) with proximal linearization is developed to be a useful method for obtaining the desired symmetric ADMM compatibility. Generally linear convergence is obtained, while communications overall are reduced because of fast convergence despite the 2-round per iteration needed.
The experiments are limited to a single group size, and are rather basic. Robustness to dropouts or topology changes isn’t clear. Tuning is required and sensitivity and robustness to topology and number of agents are not explored.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
