Multimodal Deep Learning for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing 177Lu-based Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that multimodal deep learning models integrating laboratory, imaging, and clinical data can effectively predict progression-free survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, potentially guiding personalized treatment plans.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel multimodal deep learning approach that combines laboratory, SR-PET, and CT data to improve PFS prediction in neuroendocrine tumor patients, outperforming unimodal models.

Findings

Multimodal model achieved AUROC of 0.72, surpassing unimodal models.

Laboratory biomarkers like chromogranin A and gamma-GT are significant predictors.

Multimodal deep learning can support risk-adapted follow-up strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), yet long-term disease control occurs only in a subset of patients. Predicting progression-free survival (PFS) could support individualized treatment planning. This study evaluates laboratory, imaging, and multimodal deep learning models for PFS prediction in PRRT-treated patients. In this retrospective, single-center study 116 patients with metastatic NETs undergoing 177Lu-DOTATOC were included. Clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and pretherapeutic somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomographies (SR-PET/CT) were collected. Seven models were trained to classify low- vs. high-PFS groups, including unimodal (laboratory, SR-PET, or CT) and multimodal fusion approaches. Explainability was evaluated by feature importance analysis and gradient maps. Forty-two patients (36%) had short PFS (< 1 year), 74 patients long PFS (>1 year). Groups were similar in most characteristics, except for higher baseline chromogranin A (p = 0.003), elevated gamma-GT (p = 0.002), and fewer PRRT cycles (p < 0.001) in short-PFS patients. The Random Forest model trained only on laboratory biomarkers reached an AUROC of 0.59 +- 0.02. Unimodal three-dimensional convolutional neural networks using SR-PET or CT performed worse (AUROC 0.42 +- 0.03 and 0.54 +- 0.01, respectively). A multimodal fusion model laboratory values, SR-PET, and CT -augmented with a pretrained CT branch - achieved the best results (AUROC 0.72 +- 0.01, AUPRC 0.80 +- 0.01). Multimodal deep learning combining SR-PET, CT, and laboratory biomarkers outperformed unimodal approaches for PFS prediction after PRRT. Upon external validation, such models may support risk-adapted follow-up strategies.