unimpeded: A Public Grid of Nested Sampling Chains for Cosmological Model Comparison and Tension Analysis
Dily Duan Yi Ong, Will Handley

TL;DR
The paper introduces 'unimpeded', a Python library with pre-computed chains for cosmological model comparison, revealing that combined data generally favor the standard ΛCDM model and highlighting significant tensions between specific datasets.
Contribution
It provides a public resource for efficient Bayesian analysis across multiple cosmological models and datasets, enabling systematic tension and model comparison studies.
Findings
ΛCDM is most often preferred in combined analyses.
Significant tensions exist between DES and Planck, and SH0ES and Planck datasets.
The Hubble tension persists across models, while the $S_8$ tension is partially resolvable.
Abstract
Bayesian inference is central to modern cosmology, yet comprehensive model comparison and tension quantification remain computationally prohibitive for many researchers. To address this, we release , a publicly available Python library and data repository providing pre-computed nested sampling and MCMC chains. We apply this resource to conduct a systematic analysis across a grid of eight cosmological models, including CDM and seven extensions, and 39 datasets, including individual probes and their pairwise combinations. Our model comparison reveals that whilst individual datasets show varied preferences for model extensions, the base CDM model is most frequently preferred in combined analyses, with the general trend suggesting that evidence for new physics is diluted when probes are combined. Using five complementary statistics, we quantify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
