Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) $n^{1/2}$ queries
Mark Chen, Xi Chen, Hao Cui, William Pires, Jonah Stockwell

TL;DR
This paper establishes a near-tight lower bound on the number of queries needed for adaptive algorithms to test the monotonicity of Boolean functions, significantly narrowing the gap with existing upper bounds.
Contribution
It improves the lower bound for monotonicity testing to nearly match the known upper bound, advancing theoretical understanding of query complexity.
Findings
Lower bound of (n^{1/2 - c}) queries for any constant c>0
Improves previous (n^{1/3}) lower bound
Almost matches the ((\
Abstract
We show that for any constant , any (two-sided error) adaptive algorithm for testing monotonicity of Boolean functions must have query complexity . This improves the lower bound of [CWX17] and almost matches the upper bound of [KMS18].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Advanced Graph Theory Research
