SVP$_p$ is Deterministically NP-Hard for all $p > 2$, Even to Approximate Within a Factor of $2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon} n}$
Isaac M. Hair, Amit Sahai

TL;DR
This paper proves that the Shortest Vector Problem in $ ext{l}_p$ norms for $p > 2$ is NP-hard to approximate within a nearly exponential factor, establishing new hardness results for exact and approximate solutions.
Contribution
It provides the first proof of NP-hardness for exact SVP$_p$ in finite $ ext{l}_p$ norms and introduces elementary reduction techniques from PCP instances.
Findings
SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within $2^{ ext{log}^{1- ext{epsilon}} n}$ for all $p > 2$
Exact SVP$_p$ is NP-hard in finite $ ext{l}_p$ norms
Elementary reduction techniques using Vandermonde and Hadamard matrices
Abstract
We prove that SVP is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of , for all constants and , under standard deterministic Karp reductions. This result is also the first proof that \emph{exact} SVP is NP-hard in a finite norm. Hardness for SVP with finite was previously only known if NP RP, and under that assumption, hardness of approximation was only known for all constant factors. As a corollary to our main theorem, we show that under the Sliding Scale Conjecture, SVP is NP-hard to approximate within a small polynomial factor, for all constants . Our proof techniques are surprisingly elementary; we reduce from a \emph{regularized} PCP instance directly to the shortest vector problem by using simple gadgets related to Vandermonde matrices and Hadamard matrices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
