Revealing AI Reasoning Increases Trust but Crowds Out Unique Human Knowledge
Zenan Chen, Ruijiang Gao, Yingzhi Liang

TL;DR
Revealing AI reasoning boosts trust but can overshadow unique human insights, potentially leading to over-reliance on AI in collaborative decision-making.
Contribution
This study empirically demonstrates that displaying AI reasoning increases trust but may reduce the use of valuable human knowledge, highlighting challenges in designing transparent AI systems.
Findings
AI reasoning display increases trust and agreement
Transparency induces over-trust, crowding out human knowledge
Implications for designing better human-AI collaboration systems
Abstract
Effective human-AI collaboration requires humans to accurately gauge AI capabilities and calibrate their trust accordingly. Humans often have context-dependent private information, referred to as Unique Human Knowledge (UHK), that is crucial for deciding whether to accept or override AI's recommendations. We examine how displaying AI reasoning affects trust and UHK utilization through a pre-registered, incentive-compatible experiment (N = 752). We find that revealing AI reasoning, whether brief or extensive, acts as a powerful persuasive heuristic that significantly increases trust and agreement with AI recommendations. Rather than helping participants appropriately calibrate their trust, this transparency induces over-trust that crowds out UHK utilization. Our results highlight the need for careful consideration when revealing AI reasoning and call for better information design in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · AI in Service Interactions · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
