Temporal Zoom Networks: Distance Regression and Continuous Depth for Efficient Action Localization

TL;DR

This paper introduces Temporal Zoom Networks with Boundary Distance Regression and Adaptive Temporal Refinement, achieving efficient and accurate action localization by focusing computation on difficult boundaries, reducing FLOPs and latency.

Contribution

It presents a novel distance regression approach and a continuous depth allocation mechanism, improving efficiency and accuracy in temporal action localization.

Findings

Achieves 56.5% mAP@0.7 on THUMOS14 with fewer FLOPs

Reduces FLOPs by 36% compared to ActionFormer++

Improves short action detection by 4.2% mAP

Abstract

Temporal action localization requires both precise boundary detection and computational efficiency. Current methods apply uniform computation across all temporal positions, wasting resources on easy boundaries while struggling with ambiguous ones. We address this through two complementary innovations: Boundary Distance Regression (BDR), which replaces classification-based boundary detection with signed-distance regression achieving 3.3--16.7$\times$ lower variance; and Adaptive Temporal Refinement (ATR), which allocates transformer depth continuously ($\tau\in[0,1]$) to concentrate computation near difficult boundaries. On THUMOS14, our method achieves 56.5\% mAP@0.7 and 58.2\% average mAP@[0.3:0.7] with 151G FLOPs, using 36\% fewer FLOPs than ActionFormer++ (55.7\% mAP@0.7 at 235G). Compared to uniform baselines, we achieve +2.9\% mAP@0.7 (+1.8\% avg mAP, 5.4\% relative) with 24\% fewer FLOPs and 29\% lower latency, with particularly strong gains on short actions (+4.2\%, 8.6\% relative). Training requires 1.29$\times$ baseline FLOPs, but this one-time cost is amortized over many inference runs; knowledge distillation further reduces this to 1.1$\times$ while retaining 99.5\% accuracy. Our contributions include: (i) a theoretically-grounded distance formulation with information-theoretic analysis showing optimal variance scaling; (ii) a continuous depth allocation mechanism avoiding discrete routing complexity; and (iii) consistent improvements across four datasets with gains correlating with boundary heterogeneity.