DeepFixel: Crossing white matter fiber identification through spherical convolutional neural networks

TL;DR

DeepFixel employs spherical convolutional neural networks to efficiently and accurately separate crossing white matter fibers in brain imaging, outperforming traditional optimization methods in speed and resolution.

Contribution

This paper introduces DeepFixel, a novel neural network approach that approximates nonlinear fiber separation optimization with higher angular resolution and improved computational efficiency.

Findings

DeepFixel achieves a median angular correlation coefficient of 0.973.

It is 3.125 times faster than the nonlinear optimization.

DeepFixel outperforms fixel-based algorithms at small angular separations.

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows for reconstruction of models for structural connectivity in the brain, such as fiber orientation distribution functions (ODFs) that describe the distribution, direction, and volume of white matter fiber bundles in a voxel. Crossing white matter fibers in voxels complicate analysis and can lead to errors in downstream tasks like tractography. We introduce one option for separating fiber ODFs by performing a nonlinear optimization to fit ODFs to the given data and penalizing terms that are not symmetric about the axis of the fiber. However, this optimization is non-convex and computationally infeasible across an entire image (approximately 1.01 x 106 ms per voxel). We introduce DeepFixel, a spherical convolutional neural network approximation for this nonlinear optimization. We model the probability distribution of fibers as a spherical mesh with higher angular resolution than a truncated spherical harmonic representation. To validate DeepFixel, we compare to the nonlinear optimization and a fixel-based separation algorithm of two-fiber and three-fiber ODFs. The median angular correlation coefficient is 1 (interquartile range of 0.00) using the nonlinear optimization algorithm, 0.988 (0.317) using a fiber bundle elements or "fixel"-based separation algorithm, and 0.973 (0.004) using DeepFixel. DeepFixel is more computationally efficient than the non-convex optimization (0.32 ms per voxel). DeepFixel's spherical mesh representation is successful at disentangling at smaller angular separations and smaller volume fractions than the fixel-based separation algorithm.