Multifractality and sample size influence on Bitcoin volatility patterns
Tetsuya Takaishi

TL;DR
This paper investigates how sample size affects the estimation of the Hurst exponent in Bitcoin volatility data and reveals multifractality in realized volatility, indicating complex market dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces a finite sample ansatz for the Hurst exponent and demonstrates multifractality in Bitcoin volatility, expanding understanding of market complexity.
Findings
Hurst exponent decreases with larger sampling periods
Finite sample ansatz fits Hurst exponent data well
Realized volatility exhibits multifractality, less than that of price returns
Abstract
The finite sample effect on the Hurst exponent (HE) of realized volatility time series is examined using Bitcoin data. This study finds that the HE decreases as the sampling period increases and a simple finite sample ansatz closely fits the HE data. We obtain values of the HE as , which are smaller than 1/2, indicating rough volatility. The relative error is found to be for the widely used five-minute realized volatility. Performing a multifractal analysis, we find the multifractality in the realized volatility time series, smaller than that of the price-return time series.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Chaos control and synchronization · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
