Niobium's intrinsic coherence length and penetration depth revisited using low-energy muon spin spectroscopy and secondary-ion mass spectrometry
Ryan M. L. McFadden, Jonathan W. Angle, Eric M. Lechner, Michael J. Kelley, Charles E. Reece, Matthew A. Coble, Thomas Prokscha, Zaher Salman, Andreas Suter, and Tobias Junginger

TL;DR
This study precisely measures the intrinsic coherence length and penetration depth in oxygen-doped niobium using advanced depth-resolved techniques, revealing that clean niobium is near the boundary between type-I and type-II superconductivity.
Contribution
It provides direct, nanoscale measurements of key superconducting length scales in niobium, refining their values and implications for its classification as a superconductor.
Findings
Intrinsic penetration depth $\\lambda_L$ is approximately 29 nm.
Coherence length $\xi_0$ is approximately 40 nm.
Niobium's Ginzburg-Landau parameter suggests it is near the type-I/type-II boundary.
Abstract
We report direct, simultaneous measurements of the London penetration depth () and Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) coherence length () in oxygen-doped niobium, with impurity concentrations spanning the "clean" to "dirty" limits. Two depth-resolved techniques - low-energy muon spin spectroscopy (LE-SR) and secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) - were used to quantify the element's Meissner screening profiles, analyzed within a framework that accounts for nonlocal electrodynamics. The analysis indicates intrinsic length scales of nm and nm, corresponding to a Ginzburg-Landau (GL) parameter of . The obtained and values, accurately quantified at the nanoscale, are smaller than values commonly used in applications and modeling, and indicate that clean niobium lies at the boundary between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
