Lunar Time
Pascale Defraigne, Fr\'ed\'eric Meynadier, Adrien Bourgoin

TL;DR
This paper analyzes various options for lunar coordinate time to support precise navigation and positioning on the Moon, concluding that the IAU's TCL is the most practical choice without needing a new time scale.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive trade-off analysis of potential lunar time scales, recommending TCL as the optimal reference for lunar navigation systems.
Findings
TCL is the most suitable lunar coordinate time.
No new time scale is necessary beyond TCL.
Trade-off analysis supports the adoption of TCL.
Abstract
The regain of interest in Moon exploration has substantially grown in the last years. For this reason, the space agencies consider the development of a precise navigation and positioning service similar to the Earth GNSS. Aiming at some meter accuracy, this requires to set up a relativistic lunar reference frame, with an associated coordinate time. If the IAU already defined the Lunar Coordinate Time TCL, there is still some freedom in the choice of the coordinate timescale to be adopted as reference on or around the Moon. This paper proposes a trade-off analysis of different possible options for this reference time scale. It shows that TCL is the best option to be used as practical time reference on the Moon, without the need to define a new time scale based on a scaling of TCL.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies · GNSS positioning and interference
