Nominal thresholds for good astrometric fits, and prospects for binary detectability, for the full extended Gaia mission
F. Guerriero, Z. Penoyre, A. G. A. Brown

TL;DR
This paper assesses Gaia's extended mission data to establish thresholds for astrometric fit quality, enhancing binary star detection prospects through improved RUWE parameter analysis over a 10-year baseline.
Contribution
It introduces updated RUWE thresholds for Gaia DR4 and DR5, increasing binary detection sensitivity, especially for short and long-period systems, based on simulated Gaia data.
Findings
RUWE thresholds improve binary detection rates by 5-10% per data release.
Detection of binaries with periods down to days is feasible with updated thresholds.
Long-period binary detection increases by 10-20%, including systems with periods up to 100 years.
Abstract
The full extended Gaia mission spans slightly over 10 years, whilst the current data releases represent only a fraction of it, 34 months in Gaia's third data release (DR3). The longer baseline improves the quality of astrometric fits, lowering the noise floor and making consistently bad fits (e.g., due to binarity) more apparent. In this paper, we use simulated binaries from the Gaia Universe Model to examine the long-term astrometric behaviour of single stars and stellar binaries. We calculate nominal upper limits on the spread of goodness of astrometric fits for well-behaved single stars. Specifically, for the RUWE parameter, for upcoming DR4 () and DR5 (), using the full mission nominal scanning law. These can be used to identify poor astrometric fits and can flag potential binary systems. We show the increase in the number and type of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
