A Comparison of Road Grade Preview Signals from Lidar and Maps
Logan Schexnaydre, Aman Poovalappil, Darrell Robinette, Jeremy Bos

TL;DR
This paper compares lidar-based and map-based methods for estimating road grade to improve automated vehicle control, demonstrating lidar's viability for real-time, accurate grade measurement.
Contribution
It introduces a lidar-based road grade estimation method using point cloud data and Kalman filtering, showing comparable accuracy to map-based systems.
Findings
Lidar-based estimator has a standard deviation of 0.6 degrees at 52.7 meters.
Lidar method provides unbiased, real-time road grade estimates.
Lidar-based approach enhances vehicle control robustness and independence.
Abstract
Road grade can impact the energy efficiency, safety, and comfort associated with automated vehicle control systems. Currently, control systems that attempt to compensate for road grade are designed with one of two assumptions. Either the grade is only known once the vehicle is driving over the road segment through proprioception, or complete knowledge of the oncoming road grade is known from a pre-made map. Both assumptions limit the performance of a control system, as not having a preview signal prevents proactive grade compensation, whereas relying only on map data potentially subjects the control system to missing or outdated information. These limits can be avoided by measuring the oncoming grade in real-time using on-board lidar sensors. In this work, we use point returns accumulated during travel to estimate the grade at each waypoint along a path. The estimated grade is defined…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
