Uniform interpolation for interpretability logic
Sebastijan Horvat, Borja Sierra Miranda, Thomas Studer

TL;DR
This paper develops proof-theoretical frameworks for interpretability logic IL, demonstrating that cyclic proofs enable uniform interpolation, which also applies to the extended logic ILP, advancing the understanding of their structural properties.
Contribution
It introduces wellfounded and non-wellfounded sequent calculi for IL, proving uniform interpolation using cyclic proof techniques, and extends results to ILP.
Findings
Cyclic proofs suffice for IL's proof theory.
Uniform interpolation is established for IL.
Uniform interpolation is also proved for ILP.
Abstract
We present a proof-theoretical study of the interpretability logic IL, providing a wellfounded and a non-wellfounded sequent calculus for IL. The non-wellfounded calculus is used to establish a cut elimination argument for both calculi. In addition, we show that the non-wellfounded proof theory of IL is well-behaved, i.e., that cyclic proofs suffice. This makes it possible to prove uniform interpolation for IL. As a corollary we also provide a proof of uniform interpolation for the interpretability logic ILP.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Formal Methods in Verification
