Lyapunov Stability Learning with Nonlinear Control via Inductive Biases
Yupu Lu, Shijie Lin, Hao Xu, Zeqing Zhang, Jia Pan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach to learning control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) using inductive biases, resulting in more stable and efficient training for nonlinear control systems.
Contribution
The authors propose treating Lyapunov conditions as inductive biases, enabling end-to-end learning of neural CLFs and controllers with improved convergence and stability.
Findings
Higher convergence rate compared to existing methods
Larger region of attraction achieved in experiments
Enhanced understanding of previous methods' failure modes
Abstract
Finding a control Lyapunov function (CLF) in a dynamical system with a controller is an effective way to guarantee stability, which is a crucial issue in safety-concerned applications. Recently, deep learning models representing CLFs have been applied into a learner-verifier framework to identify satisfiable candidates. However, the learner treats Lyapunov conditions as complex constraints for optimisation, which is hard to achieve global convergence. It is also too complicated to implement these Lyapunov conditions for verification. To improve this framework, we treat Lyapunov conditions as inductive biases and design a neural CLF and a CLF-based controller guided by this knowledge. This design enables a stable optimisation process with limited constraints, and allows end-to-end learning of both the CLF and the controller. Our approach achieves a higher convergence rate and larger…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
The paper is well-written and easy to follow, with clear logic and a well-structured layout. It demonstrates a substantial amount of work, evident through the extensive experimental results and accompanying visualizations.
While the paper presents valuable insights, there are several areas that could be improved. 1. The discussion of related work is somewhat redundant, as the analysis of stability using Lyapunov theory and CLFs is well-known in the field and does not require extensive elaboration. Instead, the paper lacks sufficient citations and discussion regarding existing works that integrate learning and verification frameworks for CLF synthesis. 2. The paper's novelty is limited, which is evident not only in
The framework achieves a larger region of attraction (ROA) compared to traditional approaches. Through continuous feedback from counterexamples, the model refines its stability properties, resulting in higher convergence rates and robust performance across a broader range of initial conditions in the state space.
1. Both Dai et al., 2021 and Chang et al. 2019 are discussed in detail in the paper. Missing related work: Wu, Junlin, Andrew Clark, Yiannis Kantaros, and Yevgeniy Vorobeychik. "Neural lyapunov control for discrete-time systems." Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (2023): 2939-2955. The setting is similar to Dai et al., 2021, except Dai et al., 2021 studies stability for NN dynamics, and this paper studies stability for nonlinear dynamics as in Chang et al. 2019. 2. The cod
The paper is well-organized and easy to follow.
1. The literature review about the Lyapunov function for the stability analysis of nonlinear systems is insufficient. This topic is well-studied in the control community. The directions include deriving more relaxed stability conditions (compared with the ones in Eq. (3)) and constructing more advanced (e.g., piecewise, state-dependent, delayed) Lyapunov candidates. The paper should include comparisons with existing work, such as in [4]. 2. The last paragraph on page 3: “To the best of our kno
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Control Systems and Identification
