TL;DR
This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of various video quality metrics on both neural and traditional 4K video codecs through subjective testing and analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of existing quality metrics' applicability to neural codecs, supported by a publicly available dataset.
Findings
VMAF and AVQBits|H0|f show strong Pearson correlation.
FasterVQA performs best among no-reference metrics.
PSNR has the highest Spearman correlation across codecs.
Abstract
With neural video codecs (NVCs) emerging as promising alternatives for traditional compression methods, it is increasingly important to determine whether existing quality metrics remain valid for evaluating their performance. However, few studies have systematically investigated this using well-designed subjective tests. To address this gap, this paper presents a subjective quality assessment study using two traditional (AV1 and VVC) and two variants of a neural video codec (DCVC-FM and DCVC-RT). Six source videos (8-10 seconds each, 4K/UHD-1, 60 fps) were encoded at four resolutions (360p to 2160p) using nine different QP values, resulting in 216 sequences that were rated in a controlled environment by 30 participants. These results were used to evaluate a range of full-reference, hybrid, and no-reference quality metrics to assess their applicability to the induced quality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage and Video Quality Assessment · Video Coding and Compression Technologies · Advanced Data Compression Techniques
