Validation of Semi-Empirical xTB Methods for High-Throughput Screening of TADF Emitters: A 747-Molecule Benchmark Study
Jean-Pierre Tchapet Njafa, Elvira Vanelle Kameni Tcheuffa, Aissatou Maghame, Serge Guy Nana Engo

TL;DR
This study validates semi-empirical xTB methods for high-throughput screening of TADF emitters, demonstrating significant computational savings and reliable relative ranking across a large dataset, aiding efficient OLED material discovery.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive benchmark validating semi-empirical xTB methods for TADF screening, establishing their accuracy, efficiency, and utility in guiding molecular design.
Findings
xTB methods reduce computational cost by over 99% compared to TD-DFT.
Validated methods show a mean absolute error of ~0.17 eV in excitation energy predictions.
Identified optimal D-A torsional angles of 50-90 degrees for TADF efficiency.
Abstract
Thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters are essential for next-generation, high-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), yet their rational design is hampered by the high computational cost of accurate excited-state predictions. Here, we present a comprehensive benchmark study validating semi-empirical extended tight-binding (xTB) methods -- specifically sTDA-xTB and sTD-DFT-xTB -- for the high-throughput screening of TADF materials. Using an unprecedentedly large dataset of \num{747} experimentally characterized emitters, our framework demonstrates a computational cost reduction of over \qty{99}{\percent} compared to conventional TD-DFT, while maintaining strong internal consistency between methods (Pearson for \deltaest), validating their utility for relative molecular ranking. Validation against \num{312} experimental \deltaest values…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
