When Small Acts Scale: Ethical Thresholds in Network Diffusion
Masoud Makrehchi

TL;DR
This paper models how ethical actions spread in social networks, identifying thresholds that determine whether they saturate, grow linearly, or explode geometrically, influenced by platform design factors.
Contribution
It introduces a minimal message-passing model with a closed-form network multiplier and identifies a critical threshold for ethical diffusion regimes.
Findings
Identifies a threshold r=b.alpha.q=1 separating different diffusion regimes
Provides a model linking platform design levers to ethical responsibility spread
Applicable to pandemic, vaccination, and norm amplification contexts
Abstract
Much ethical evaluation treats actions dyadically: one agent acts on one recipient. In networked, platform-mediated environments, this lens misses how public acts diffuse. We introduce a minimal message-passing model in which an initiating act with baseline valence w spreads across a social graph with exposure b, per-hop salience , compliance , and depth (horizon) d. The model yields a closed-form \emph{network multiplier} relative to the dyadic baseline and identifies a threshold at r=b.alpha.q=1 separating subcritical (saturating), critical (linear), and supercritical (geometric) regimes. We show how common platform design levers -- reach and fan-out (affecting b), ranking and context (affecting alpha), share mechanics and friction (affecting q), and time-bounds (affecting d) -- systematically change expected downstream responsibility Applications include pandemic mitigation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Digital Platforms and Economics · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
