A Critical Examination of the PAH Hypothesis
Alan T. Tokunaga, Lawrence S. Bernstein, and Takashi Onaka

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the PAH hypothesis, questioning whether gas-phase PAH molecules can fully explain the observed aromatic infrared bands given spectral uniformity and formation challenges.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the PAH hypothesis, highlighting inconsistencies with spectral data and formation pathways, and calls for further quantitative investigation.
Findings
Spectral uniformity suggests a small set of PAH species.
Current models require a wide range of PAH types.
There is no plausible formation pathway for limited PAH species.
Abstract
The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) hypothesis proposes that the aromatic infrared bands (AIBs) observed at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and 12.7 mic originate from gas-phase PAH molecules. These bands exhibit consistent peak wavelengths and profiles in diverse sources, and ISO SWS and JWST spectra show a nearly identical red wing of the 3.3 mic AIB and blue wing of the 11.2 mic AIB in the dominant Class A sources. This spectral uniformity suggests that the AIBs arise from a small, well-defined set of gas phase PAH species, regardless of the excitation conditions or the nature of the source such as HII regions, reflection nebulae, planetary nebula, young stellar objects, or the diffuse interstellar medium. However, a small number of gas phase PAH species is inconsistent with current modeling of the AIBs that require a wide range of PAH types and sizes. It is also inconsistent with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact · Circadian rhythm and melatonin
