Comparing the numbers of subforests and subgraph-degree-tuples
Sergei Shteiner, Pavel Shteyner

TL;DR
This paper explores the enumeration of certain matrix row-column sums and their connection to acyclic subgraphs in grid graphs, extending the correspondence to broader graph classes and proposing new conjectures.
Contribution
It establishes a novel link between matrix enumeration and acyclic subgraph counts, and formulates conjectures relating degree sequences to subgraph counts in bipartite graphs.
Findings
Count of specific matrix row-column sums matches acyclic subgraph numbers.
Conjecture relating degree sequences of subgraphs to acyclic subgraph counts.
Proven cases for cactus and generalized book graphs.
Abstract
We enumerate the row-column-sums of all square tridiagonal -matrices and prove that their count coincides with OEIS A022026 the number of acyclic subgraphs of the complete grid graph. We then extend this correspondence in two independent directions: 1. admitting larger sets of matrix entries, and 2. relaxing the tridiagonal support to broader prescribed sparsity patterns. The latter leads us to conjecture that, for any bipartite graph , the number of its acyclic subgraphs equals the number of degree sequences realized by subgraphs of . Moreover, for any non-bipartite graph, the former should be strictly smaller than the latter. We discuss several general approaches and prove these hypotheses for cactus graphs and generalized book graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Graph theory and applications · Digital Image Processing Techniques
