Safety Margins of Inverse Optimal ISSf Controllers
Ziliang Lyu, Yiguang Hong, Lihua Xie, Miroslav Krstic

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the gain margins of inverse optimal ISSf controllers for nonlinear systems, establishing theoretical conditions and proposing a gain margin improvement method to enhance robustness and safety.
Contribution
It introduces a converse ISSf-BF theorem, characterizes gain margins, and proposes a robust gain margin enhancement approach for inverse optimal ISSf controllers.
Findings
Standard inverse optimal safe controllers have a gain margin up to half when f(x) acts safely.
If f(x) acts unsafely, the gain can be increased arbitrarily if u0 acts safely.
The proposed gain margin improvement ensures robustness and global stability of the safe set.
Abstract
We investigate the gain margin of a general nonlinear system under an inverse optimal input-to-state safe (ISSf) controller of the form u=u0(x)+u*(x,u0), where u0 is the nominal control and u* is the inverse optimal safety filter that minimally modifies the nominal controller's unsafe actions over the infinite horizon. By first establishing a converse ISSf-BF theorem, we reveal the equivalence among the achievability of ISSf by feedback, the achievability of inverse optimality, and the solvability of a Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs equation associated with the inverse optimal ISSf gain assignment. Then we develop a collection of safety margin results on the overall control u=u0+u*. In the absence of disturbances, we find that standard inverse optimal safe controllers have a certain degree of gain margin. Specifically, when f(x) acts safely but u0 acts unsafely, the gain can be decreased by up…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
