Linear Causal Discovery with Interventional Constraints
Zhigao Guo, Feng Dong

TL;DR
This paper introduces interventional constraints for causal discovery, enabling models to incorporate high-level causal knowledge through inequality constraints on effects, improving accuracy and interpretability.
Contribution
It proposes a novel framework for causal discovery using interventional constraints, formalizes the approach for linear models, and demonstrates its effectiveness on real datasets.
Findings
Improves causal model accuracy with constraints
Ensures consistency with known causal effects
Facilitates discovery of new causal relationships
Abstract
Incorporating causal knowledge and mechanisms is essential for refining causal models and improving downstream tasks such as designing new treatments. In this paper, we introduce a novel concept in causal discovery, termed interventional constraints, which differs fundamentally from interventional data. While interventional data require direct perturbations of variables, interventional constraints encode high-level causal knowledge in the form of inequality constraints on causal effects. For instance, in the Sachs dataset (Sachs et al.\ 2005), Akt has been shown to be activated by PIP3, meaning PIP3 exerts a positive causal effect on Akt. Existing causal discovery methods allow enforcing structural constraints (for example, requiring a causal path from PIP3 to Akt), but they may still produce incorrect causal conclusions such as learning that "PIP3 inhibits Akt". Interventional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
