Evidence of cosmic-ray acceleration up to sub-PeV energies in the supernova remnant IC 443
Zhen Cao, F. Aharonian, Y.X. Bai, Y.W. Bao, D. Bastieri, X.J. Bi, Y.J. Bi, W. Bian, A.V. Bukevich, C.M. Cai, W.Y. Cao, Zhe Cao, J. Chang, J.F. Chang, A.M. Chen, E.S. Chen, G.H. Chen, H.X. Chen, Liang Chen, Long Chen, M.J. Chen, M.L. Chen, Q.H. Chen, S. Chen, S.H. Chen, S.Z. Chen

TL;DR
This study presents evidence that supernova remnant IC 443 accelerates cosmic rays up to sub-PeV energies, based on high-energy gamma-ray observations indicating particles reaching hundreds of TeV.
Contribution
It provides the first observational evidence that SNRs can accelerate cosmic rays up to sub-PeV energies, extending previous knowledge of cosmic-ray acceleration limits.
Findings
Gamma-ray emission from IC 443 extends beyond 30 TeV.
Protons are accelerated to at least 300 TeV assuming hadronic origin.
Evidence supports SNRs as sources of sub-PeV cosmic rays.
Abstract
Supernova remnants (SNRs) have been considered as the primary contributors to cosmic rays (CRs) in our Galaxy. However, the maximum energy of particles that can be accelerated by shocks of SNRs is uncertain, and SNRs' contribution to CRs around PeV energies is unclear. In this study, we present observations of high-energy -ray emission from the SNR IC 443 using the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO). The morphological analysis reveals a pointlike source whose location and spectrum are consistent with those of the Fermi-LAT-detected compact source with -decay signature, and a more extended source that is associated with a newly discovered Fermi source. The spectrum of the point source can be described by a power-law function with an index of , extending beyond TeV without apparent cutoff. Assuming a hadronic origin of the -ray…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
