InputDSA: Demixing then Comparing Recurrent and Externally Driven Dynamics
Ann Huang, Mitchell Ostrow, Satpreet H. Singh, Leo Kozachkov, Ila Fiete, Kanaka Rajan

TL;DR
InputDSA is a new method that compares the intrinsic and input-driven dynamics of systems, improving upon previous approaches by accounting for external inputs and demonstrating robustness on neural and artificial systems.
Contribution
It introduces InputDSA, a novel metric extending DSA to include input effects using DMDc, enabling better comparison of input-driven and autonomous systems.
Findings
InputDSA successfully compares partially observed, noisy systems.
Surrogate inputs can replace true inputs with minimal accuracy loss.
High-performing RNNs are dynamically similar, low-performing are diverse.
Abstract
In control problems and basic scientific modeling, it is important to compare observations with dynamical simulations. For example, comparing two neural systems can shed light on the nature of emergent computations in the brain and deep neural networks. Recently, Ostrow et al. (2023) introduced Dynamical Similarity Analysis (DSA), a method to measure the similarity of two systems based on their recurrent dynamics rather than geometry or topology. However, DSA does not consider how inputs affect the dynamics, meaning that two similar systems, if driven differently, may be classified as different. Because real-world dynamical systems are rarely autonomous, it is important to account for the effects of input drive. To this end, we introduce a novel metric for comparing both intrinsic (recurrent) and input-driven dynamics, called InputDSA (iDSA). InputDSA extends the DSA framework by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
