Mitigating gain calibration errors from EoR observations with SKA1-Low AA*
Eeshan Beohar, Abhirup Datta, Anshuman Tripathi, Samit Kumar Pal, and Rashmi Sagar

TL;DR
This study assesses how residual gain calibration errors impact foreground mitigation in SKA1-Low EoR observations, demonstrating that errors below 1% allow effective recovery of the 21-cm signal.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid foreground mitigation approach combining Gaussian process regression, PCA, and avoidance, and evaluates its effectiveness under various calibration error thresholds.
Findings
Recovery of the HI signal is feasible with calibration errors ≤ 1%.
Gain errors above 1% cause significant large-scale signal suppression.
Hybrid mitigation maintains sensitivity with minimal power loss within error thresholds.
Abstract
The observations of the redshifted 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen are a promising probe for understanding the Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR). One of the primary obstacles to the statistical detection of the Cosmological signal is the presence of residual foreground arising from gain calibration errors. Previous studies have shown that gain calibration errors as small as 0.01 can lead to a biased interpretation of the observed signal power spectrum estimation, by nearly an order of magnitude. A recent study further highlights that to accurately retrieve astrophysical parameters, the threshold gain calibration error should be below 0.01. This work investigates the impact of residual extragalactic foregrounds arising from gain calibration errors on the efficacy of foreground mitigation strategies. We use an end-to-end pipeline to simulate a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
