LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection
Adam S. Jovine, Tinghan Ye, Francis Bahk, Jingjing Wang, Matthew Ford, David B. Shmoys, Peter I. Frazier

TL;DR
LISTEN introduces an LLM-based framework that iteratively refines preferences and makes decisions for multi-objective tasks, reducing the need for explicit preference formalization.
Contribution
The paper proposes two novel algorithms, LISTEN-U and LISTEN-T, for multi-objective decision-making using LLMs, with a new metric for preference alignment.
Findings
LISTEN-U performs well with parametrically aligned preferences.
LISTEN-T provides robust performance across diverse tasks.
The framework reduces the cognitive burden of preference elicitation.
Abstract
Human experts often struggle to select the best option from a large set of items with multiple competing objectives, a process bottlenecked by the difficulty of formalizing complex, implicit preferences. To address this, we introduce LISTEN (LLM-based Iterative Selection with Trade-off Evaluation from Natural-language), an agentic LLM-based framework that treats the LLM as a decision-making agent capable of iteratively refining its internal preference model and taking actions (e.g., proposing utilities or selecting candidates) to maximize alignment with a user's implicit goals. To operate within LLM constraints like context windows and inference costs, we propose two iterative algorithms: LISTEN-U, which uses the LLM to refine a parametric utility function, and LISTEN-T, a non-parametric method that performs tournament-style selections over small batches of solutions. Evaluated on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
