Accurate Leakage Speculation for Quantum Error Correction
Chaithanya Naik Mude, Swamit Tannu

TL;DR
The paper introduces gladiator, a framework that accurately detects leakage in quantum error correction, reducing unnecessary interventions, shortening cycles, and improving overall fault-tolerance in quantum computing.
Contribution
Gladiator provides a code-aware, adaptable leakage speculation method that significantly reduces false positives and enhances efficiency across various quantum error correction codes.
Findings
Up to 3x reduction in unnecessary leakage-reduction circuits
Shortened quantum error correction cycles by 2x on average
Achieved 16% lower logical error rate in benchmarks
Abstract
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) protects qubits against bit- and phase-flip errors in the |0> or |1> subspace, but physical qubits can also leak into higher energy levels (e.g., |2>). Leakage is especially harmful, as it corrupts all subsequent syndrome measurements and can spread to neighboring qubits. Detecting leakage on data qubits is particularly challenging, since they are never measured directly during QEC cycles. Prior work, such as eraser, addresses this by inferring leakage from syndrome patterns using a fixed heuristic. However, this approach often misclassifies benign syndromes, triggering excessive leakage-reduction circuits (LRCs). Because LRCs are themselves noisy and slow, these false triggers lengthen QEC cycles and inflate logical error rates. We propose gladiator, a general and adaptable leakage speculation framework that works across surface code, color code, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
