Communication and Verification in LLM Agents towards Collaboration under Information Asymmetry
Run Peng, Ziqiao Ma, Amy Pang, Sikai Li, Zhang Xi-Jia, Yingzhuo Yu, Cristian-Paul Bara, Joyce Chai

TL;DR
This paper explores how LLM agents can collaborate effectively under information asymmetry by studying communication, verification, and reasoning strategies within a symbolic puzzle game, improving understanding and safety.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for LLM agent collaboration with communication and verification mechanisms, extending Einstein Puzzles to a multi-agent tabletop game.
Findings
Aligned communication improves collaboration effectiveness
Agents without communication lack true rule understanding
Environment-based verification enhances safety and interpretability
Abstract
While Large Language Model (LLM) agents are often approached from the angle of action planning/generation to accomplish a goal (e.g., given by language descriptions), their abilities to collaborate with each other to achieve a joint goal are not well explored. To address this limitation, this paper studies LLM agents in task collaboration, particularly under the condition of information asymmetry, where agents have disparities in their knowledge and skills and need to work together to complete a shared task. We extend Einstein Puzzles, a classical symbolic puzzle, to a table-top game. In this game, two LLM agents must reason, communicate, and act to satisfy spatial and relational constraints required to solve the puzzle. We apply a fine-tuning-plus-verifier framework in which LLM agents are equipped with various communication strategies and verification signals from the environment.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
