Towards Automated Quality Assurance of Patent Specifications: A Multi-Dimensional LLM Framework
Yuqian Chai, Chaochao Wang, Weilei Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-dimensional framework leveraging large language models to systematically evaluate and improve the quality of patent specifications, addressing a significant gap in AI-assisted patent drafting.
Contribution
It presents a novel integrated evaluation framework with high accuracy for assessing regulatory compliance, coherence, and figure-reference consistency in patents, validated on a large dataset.
Findings
High accuracy in detecting compliance and coherence issues.
AI-generated patents have more structural defects than human patents.
Section-specific analysis reveals areas needing targeted improvements.
Abstract
Although AI drafting tools have gained prominence in patent writing, the systematic evaluation of AI-generated patent content quality represents a significant research gap. To address this gap, We propose to evaluate patents using regulatory compliance, technical coherence, and figure-reference consistency detection modules, and then generate improvement suggestions via an integration module. The framework is validated on a comprehensive dataset comprising 80 human-authored and 80 AI-generated patents from two patent drafting tools. Evaluation is performed on 10,841 total sentences, 8,924 non-template sentences, and 554 patent figures for the three detection modules respectively, achieving balanced accuracies of 99.74%, 82.12%, and 91.2% against expert annotations. Additional analysis was conducted to examine defect distributions across patent sections, technical domains, and authoring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
