Integrating Legal and Logical Specifications in Perception, Prediction, and Planning for Automated Driving: A Survey of Methods
Kumar Manas, Mert Keser, Alois Knoll

TL;DR
This survey reviews methods integrating legal and logical specifications into perception, prediction, and planning for autonomous driving, emphasizing challenges, approaches, and future directions for legally compliant and interpretable systems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive taxonomy and analysis of current approaches combining legal norms and logical reasoning in autonomous vehicle modules, highlighting key challenges and open questions.
Findings
Logic-based frameworks enhance interpretability.
Legal norms integration improves compliance and accountability.
Neural-symbolic methods address perceptual uncertainty.
Abstract
This survey provides an analysis of current methodologies integrating legal and logical specifications into the perception, prediction, and planning modules of automated driving systems. We systematically explore techniques ranging from logic-based frameworks to computational legal reasoning approaches, emphasizing their capability to ensure regulatory compliance and interpretability in dynamic and uncertain driving environments. A central finding is that significant challenges arise at the intersection of perceptual reliability, legal compliance, and decision-making justifiability. To systematically analyze these challenges, we introduce a taxonomy categorizing existing approaches by their theoretical foundations, architectural implementations, and validation strategies. We particularly focus on methods that address perceptual uncertainty and incorporate explicit legal norms,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
