Characterization of the Li$_2$WO$_4$ crystal as a cryogenic scintillating calorimeter
D. L. Helis, A. Melchiorre, S. Nagorny, M. Noia, L. Pagnanini, S. Pirro, A. Puiu, G. Benato, P. Carniti, R. Elleboro, P. Gambacorta, C. Gotti, V. D. Grigorieva, S. Nisi, E. Olivieri, G. Pessina, S. Piacentini, M. Shafiee, V. N. Shlegel

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that Li$_2$WO$_4$ crystals can function effectively as cryogenic scintillating calorimeters, offering high energy resolution and particle discrimination, making them promising for rare-event physics searches.
Contribution
First measurement of a natural Li$_2$WO$_4$ crystal as a cryogenic scintillating calorimeter with detailed performance characterization.
Findings
Achieved 0.5 keV RMS baseline energy resolution
Particle discrimination better than 6σ between $eta/\gamma$, $\alpha$, and nuclear recoils
Low U/Th contamination levels below 0.5 mBq/kg
Abstract
A wide range of scintillating bolometers is under investigation for applications in the search for rare events and processes beyond the Standard Model. In this work, we report the first measurement of a natural, non-molybdenum-doped, lithium tungstate (LWO) crystal operated underground as a scintillating cryogenic calorimeter. The detector achieved a baseline energy resolution of 0.5 keV RMS with a low-energy threshold of about 1.5 keV. The simultaneous readout of heat and light enabled particle identification, revealing a clear separation between , , and nuclear recoil populations above 300 keV, with a light-yield-based particle discrimination better than . These results, fully comparable with those achieved with other compounds in the field, demonstrate that LWO is a promising candidate for rare-event searches. In particular, the combination of excellent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
