TL;DR
FairMIB is a novel multi-view information bottleneck framework that enhances fairness in graph neural networks by decomposing graph information, employing contrastive learning, and correcting bias propagation, achieving state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
It introduces a multi-view approach with contrastive learning and IPW adjacency correction to improve fairness and utility in GNNs, addressing bias propagation more effectively.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art fairness and utility on benchmark datasets.
Effectively mitigates bias propagation in graph message passing.
Balances fairness and utility through multi-perspective objectives.
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) excel on relational data by passing messages over node features and structure, but they can amplify training data biases, propagating discriminatory attributes and structural imbalances into unfair outcomes. Many fairness methods treat bias as a single source, ignoring distinct attribute and structure effects and leading to suboptimal fairness and utility trade-offs. To overcome this challenge, we propose FairMIB, a multi-view information bottleneck framework designed to decompose graphs into feature, structural, and diffusion views for mitigating complexity biases in GNNs. Especially, the proposed FairMIB employs contrastive learning to maximize cross-view mutual information for bias-free representation learning. It further integrates multi-perspective conditional information bottleneck objectives to balance task utility and fairness by minimizing mutual…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The paper is clear and easy to follow. 2. They evaluate on five datasets and include several baseline comparisons and ablation studies, which gives some empirical support for the proposed approach.
1. The paper has limited novelty. Nearly every component of FairMIB, i.e., information bottleneck, multi-view consistency, contrastive learning, IPW correction, has been previously published. The contribution is primarily a combination of existing tools rather than a conceptual breakthrough. The paper’s framing as a “multi-view information bottleneck” for fairness appears incremental relative to GRAFair (Zhang et al. 2025) and FDGIB (Zheng et al. 2024). There is insufficient discussion of how Fa
1 - The multi-view decomposition approach is well-motivated and addresses a genuine limitation of existing methods that treat bias as a single source. The separation into feature, structural, and diffusion views provides a principled way to disentangle different sources of bias in graph data. 2 - The theoretical framework is solid, building on established information bottleneck principles and extending them appropriately to the multi-view conditional setting. The mathematical formulation clearl
1 - The computational complexity and scalability concerns are not fully addressed. The method requires three separate encoders and additional contrastive learning computations, but there is no analysis of training time, memory requirements, or comparison of computational costs with baseline methods. 2 - The diffusion view construction using APPNP with IPW correction appears somewhat arbitrary. The paper doesn't justify why APPNP specifically was chosen over other propagation methods, nor does i
1. The paper decomposes the sources of bias in graphs into three complementary views feature, structure, and diffusion. It introduces a multi-view conditional information bottleneck (MCIB) framework that constrains the learned representations to preserve task-relevant information while being disentangled from sensitive attributes. In addition, a cross-view contrastive consistency mechanism is incorporated to align information across views. Together, these components form an end-to-end fair repre
1. The details of IPW estimation and stabilization are insufficient. Although the paper clearly states the use of IPW and provides the weighting formula, it does not specify the estimation model for the propensity score $e(i)$, nor clarify key implementation aspects such as whether it is estimated using only non-sensitive features. 2. The framework introduces additional modules, which inevitably increase time complexity compared with standard GNNs or simpler fairness methods. It would be benefi
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
