Reflecting on a Decade of Formalized Tornado Emergencies
Edward C. Wolff, James S. Goodnight, Leanne Blind-Doskocil, Elijah M. Conklin, Evan T. Gustafson, and Joseph E. Trujillo-Falc\'on

TL;DR
This study reviews a decade of formalized tornado emergencies, analyzing their issuance criteria, and suggests updates to improve forecaster adherence and warning effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of tornado emergency issuance patterns and proposes enhancements to training based on empirical findings.
Findings
Most tornado emergencies did not follow the suggested VROT and STP criteria.
70% of tornado emergencies were issued for EF-3+ tornadoes.
Tornado emergencies covered over half of EF-4 tornadoes and many fatal events.
Abstract
In 1999 the NWS began using the phrase "tornado emergency" to denote tornado warnings for storms with the potential to cause rare, catastrophic damage. After years of informal usage, tornado emergencies were formally introduced to 46 weather forecasting offices in 2014 as part of the impact-based warning (IBW) program, with a nationwide rollout occurring over the following years. In concert with the new tiered warning approach, the Warning Decision Training Division (WDTD) also introduced suggested criteria for when forecasters should consider upgrading a tornado warning to a tornado emergency, which includes thresholds of rotational velocity (VROT) and significant tornado parameter (STP). Although significant research has studied both tornado forecasting and tornado warning dissemination in the decade since, relatively little work has examined the effectiveness of the tornado emergency…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
