TL;DR
This paper reveals that large language models have an inherent low-rank structure in their logits, which can be exploited for efficient response generation and is supported by both empirical evidence and theoretical analysis.
Contribution
The study introduces a model-agnostic approach to uncover low-rank structures in language models and demonstrates their practical use in response generation.
Findings
Language model logits exhibit low-rank structure across various models.
Low-rank structure enables response generation using unrelated prompts.
Theoretical analysis supports the empirical observations and provides learning guarantees.
Abstract
A major problem in the study of large language models is to understand their inherent low-dimensional structure. We introduce an approach to study the low-dimensional structure of language models at a model-agnostic level: as sequential probabilistic models. We first empirically demonstrate that a wide range of modern language models exhibit low-rank structure: in particular, matrices built from the model's logits for varying sets of prompts and responses have low approximate rank. We then show that this low-rank structure can be leveraged for generation -- in particular, we can generate a response to a target prompt using a linear combination of the model's outputs on unrelated, or even nonsensical prompts. On the theoretical front, we observe that studying the approximate rank of language models in the sense discussed above yields a simple universal abstraction whose theoretical…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Oral
- The framework is architecture agnostic: Studies LLMs through their output distribution geometry rather than internal activations. - The analysis of extended logit matrix is relatively straightforward and tractable via matrix decomposition algorithms. - The fact that one could infer LLM generation of a target prompt using unrelated or even non-sensical prompts is very surprising.
- While the low-rank property is convincingly demonstrated, the paper stops short of providing a theoretical account for why transformer models should exhibit such linearity in distribution space. However, I do not hold this against the paper since the paper is already phenomenologically rich and self-contained. - The explanation of how the extended logit matrix is constructed, as well as its motivation, is quite abstruse. I think the paper could benefit from a cartoon illustration of the struct
I found that the experimental section is almost excellent and appreciate how the authors give a comprehension of the phenomena observed, state new hypothesis and propose future directions. On its own, this is a great contribution which opens the doors for more future research. About experiments: 1. While measuring the complete logit matrix is unfeasible for all tokens and only top-100 are considered, the analysis clearly shows low rank structures across different datasets with histories and f
While the material is excellent, with new interesting results and a theoretical reformulation of the ISAN model, the clarity should be improved. My comment arise from the fact that I had to re-read the text many times and continue jumping to appendix before completely capturing the message or familiarizing with the quantities the authors introduce. In fact, while theoretical explanations are useful in the experimental sections, it overloads the reader trying to grasp both the theory and interpr
- **Novel Framework**: The concept of the "extended logit matrix" is a simple and powerful model-agnostic abstraction. It provides a new lens to study the intrinsic dimensionality and structure of LLMs beyond just analyzing weights or single-token logits. - **Comprehensive Validation**: The paper does an excellent job supporting its claims with both strong empirical evidence and solid theoretical grounding. The empirical study is thorough, covering multiple model architectures and sizes, and th
- **Safety Implications Discussed but Not Fully Explored**: The primary weakness is that the safety implications, while highlighted, are not demonstrated in practice. The paper suggests that LINGEN could be used to "circumvent input filters," but it does not provide a concrete experiment showing such a jailbreak. The analysis is currently a proof-of-concept (i.e., generating coherent text) rather than a practical demonstration of a safety bypass. This is acknowledged as future work (Appendix E),
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
