Reviving Thorup's Shortcut Conjecture

TL;DR

This paper investigates Thorup's conjecture on the existence of efficient reachability shortcuts in graphs, allowing Steiner vertices, and presents both positive constructions and limitations, with implications for parallel algorithms.

Contribution

It revisits Thorup's conjecture by allowing Steiner vertices, provides explicit constructions that challenge existing lower bounds, and proposes a hard instance for future research.

Findings

Breaking known shortcut lower bounds with Steiner vertices

Ruling out ideal shortcuts with limited Steiner path thickness

Implications for parallel algorithms for shortcuts and flow computations

Abstract

We aim to revive Thorup's conjecture [Thorup, WG'92] on the existence of reachability shortcuts with ideal size-diameter tradeoffs. Thorup originally asked whether, given any graph $G=(V,E)$ with $m$ edges, we can add $m^{1+o(1)}$ ``shortcut'' edges $E_+$ from the transitive closure $E^*$ of $G$ so that $\text{dist}_{G_+}(u,v) \leq m^{o(1)}$ for all $(u,v)\in E^*$, where $G_+=(V,E\cup E_+)$. The conjecture was refuted by Hesse [Hesse, SODA'03], followed by significant efforts in the last few years to optimize the lower bounds. In this paper we observe that although Hesse refuted the letter of Thorup's conjecture, his work~[Hesse, SODA'03] -- and all followup work -- does not refute the spirit of the conjecture, which should allow $G_+$ to contain both new (shortcut) edges and new Steiner vertices. Our results are as follows. (1) On the positive side, we present explicit attacks that break all known shortcut lower bounds when Steiner vertices are allowed. (2) On the negative side, we rule out ideal $m^{1+o(1)}$-size, $m^{o(1)}$-diameter shortcuts whose ``thickness'' is $t=o(\log n/\log \log n)$, meaning no path can contain $t$ consecutive Steiner vertices. (3) We propose a candidate hard instance as the next step toward resolving the revised version of Thorup's conjecture. Finally, we show promising implications. Almost-optimal parallel algorithms for computing a generalization of the shortcut that approximately preserves distances or flows imply almost-optimal parallel algorithms with $m^{o(1)}$ depth for exact shortcut paths and exact maximum flow. The state-of-the-art algorithms have much worse depth of $n^{1/2+o(1)}$ [Rozho\v{n}, Haeupler, Martinsson, STOC'23] and $m^{1+o(1)}$ [Chen, Kyng, Liu, FOCS'22], respectively.