Towards constraining cosmological parameters with SPT-3G observations of 25% of the sky
A. Vitrier, K. Fichman, L. Balkenhol, E. Camphuis, F. Guidi, A. R. Khalife, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal

TL;DR
This paper forecasts how SPT-3G observations of the CMB can significantly improve constraints on cosmological parameters, especially regarding the Hubble tension, by analyzing data from different sky regions and combining with Planck data.
Contribution
It develops a realistic likelihood pipeline for analyzing SPT-3G data and demonstrates minimal information loss when analyzing sky fields separately, enhancing cosmological parameter constraints.
Findings
Analyzing sky fields separately causes minimal loss (<3%) in parameter constraints.
SPT-3G data combined with Planck improves EDE model FoM by over 300 times.
Combined data enhances constraints on the varying electron mass by over 3000 times.
Abstract
The South Pole Telescope (SPT), using its third-generation camera, SPT-3G, is conducting observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) in temperature and polarization across approximately 10 000 deg of the sky at 95, 150, and 220 GHz. This comprehensive dataset should yield stringent constraints on cosmological parameters. In this work, we explore its potential to address the Hubble tension by forecasting constraints from temperature, polarization, and CMB lensing on Early Dark Energy (EDE) and the variation in electron mass in spatially flat and curved universes. For this purpose, we investigate first whether analyzing the distinct SPT-3G observation fields independently, as opposed to as a single, unified region, results in a loss of information relevant to cosmological parameter estimation. We develop a realistic temperature and polarization likelihood pipeline capable of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
