AT2025ulz and S250818k: Investigating early time observations of a subsolar mass gravitational-wave binary neutron star merger candidate
Xander J. Hall, Malte Busmann, Hauke Koehn, Keerthi Kunnumkai, Antonella Palmese, Brendan O'Connor, James Freeburn, Lei Hu, Daniel Gruen, Tim Dietrich, Mattia Bulla, Michael W. Coughlin, Sarah Antier, Marion Pillas, Paul A. Price, Tom\'as Ahumada, Ariel Amsellem, Igor Andreoni

TL;DR
This paper reports on early observations of a candidate electromagnetic counterpart to a low-probability gravitational-wave neutron star merger, highlighting the challenges in distinguishing kilonovae from other transients with limited early data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed photometric and spectroscopic analysis of AT2025ulz, demonstrating the ambiguity in early data and emphasizing the need for extensive follow-up to confirm kilonovae.
Findings
Early data are ambiguous between kilonova and shock cooling models.
Extended monitoring revealed a supernova-like evolution.
Identifying BNS merger counterparts requires significant observational effort.
Abstract
Over the past LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA (LVK) observing runs, it has become increasingly clear that identifying the next electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational-wave (GW) neutron star mergers will likely be more challenging compared to the case of GW170817. The rarity of these GW events, and their electromagnetic counterparts, motivates rapid searches of any candidate binary neutron star (BNS) merger detected by the LVK. We present our extensive photometric and spectroscopic campaign of the candidate counterpart AT2025ulz to the low-significance GW event S250818k, which had a probability of being a BNS merger. We demonstrate that during the first five days, the luminosity and color evolution of AT2025ulz are consistent with both kilonova and shock cooling models, although a Bayesian model comparison shows preference for the shock cooling model, underscoring the ambiguity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
