Heuristic Quality Coefficients for Interferometric Phase Linking
Magnus Heimpel, Irena Hajnsek, Othmar Frey

TL;DR
This paper introduces three heuristic quality coefficients for phase linking in multitemporal InSAR, providing practical reliability indicators to improve deformation analysis accuracy.
Contribution
It develops a unified framework for heuristic quality coefficients applicable to various phase linking methods, including goodness-of-fit, closure phase, and ambiguity coefficients.
Findings
Goodness-of-fit coefficient correlates with phase error.
Closure phase coefficient serves as an effective pre-screening indicator.
Ambiguity coefficient offers additional reliability information in variable scattering regions.
Abstract
In multitemporal InSAR, phase linking (PL) refers to the estimation of a single-reference interferometric phase history for distributed scatterers (DS) from the information contained in the sample coherence matrix. Because the phase information in this matrix is typically inconsistent, DS processing needs practical reliability indicators to decide whether a pixel's PL estimate is sufficiently supported by the data for subsequent deformation analysis. For maximum-likelihood estimation, uncertainty can be quantified via Fisher-information-based covariance estimates, but no analogous, generally applicable uncertainty quantification is available for the broad range of non-ML methods. We propose three heuristic quality coefficients within a unified mathematical framework that covers common PL methods: (1) a method-specific goodness-of-fit coefficient that normalizes the achieved PL objective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
