The $q$-Laplace Transforms compared: the basic confluent hypergeometric function ${}_2\phi_0$
Daniel Meikle, Adri Olde Daalhuis

TL;DR
This paper compares three different $q$-Laplace transforms used in $q$-difference equations, providing explicit formulas for their differences, and introduces new resummation methods for ${}_2 ext{phi}_0$ functions with various properties and applications.
Contribution
It explicitly characterizes the differences between three $q$-Laplace transforms and introduces new resummation techniques for ${}_2 ext{phi}_0$ functions, expanding the understanding of $q$-special functions.
Findings
Explicit formulas for $q$-exponentially small differences between the transforms.
Mellin--Barnes integral representations for basic hypergeometric functions.
New properties and representations for ${}_2 ext{phi}_0$ functions, including connection formulas and error bounds.
Abstract
In solving -difference equations, and in the definition of -special functions, we encounter formal power series in which the th coefficient is of size with fixed. To make sense of these formal series, a -Borel-Laplace resummation is required. There are three candidates for the -Laplace transform, resulting in three different resummations. Surprisingly, the differences between these resummations have hardly been discussed in the literature. Our main result provides explicit formulas for these -exponentially small differences. We also give simple Mellin--Barnes integral representations for all the basic hypergeometric functions and derive a third (discrete) orthogonality condition for the Stieltjes--Wigert polynomials. As the main application, we introduce three resummations for the functions which can be seen…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
