Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs): An Application-Oriented Survey on RAG, Reasoning, and Agentic Systems
Yihan Li, Xiyuan Fu, Ghanshyam Verma, Paul Buitelaar, Mingming Liu

TL;DR
This paper surveys strategies like RAG and reasoning to mitigate hallucinations in large language models, emphasizing their integration in real-world applications and analyzing their mechanisms and effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides a systematic taxonomy and unified framework for understanding how RAG and reasoning mitigate hallucinations in LLMs, highlighting their synergistic potential.
Findings
RAG and reasoning effectively reduce knowledge and logic-based hallucinations
Integration of RAG and reasoning enhances LLM reliability in applications
Benchmark evaluations demonstrate improved hallucination mitigation
Abstract
Hallucination remains one of the key obstacles to the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs), particularly in real-world applications. Among various mitigation strategies, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and reasoning enhancement have emerged as two of the most effective and widely adopted approaches, marking a shift from merely suppressing hallucinations to balancing creativity and reliability. However, their synergistic potential and underlying mechanisms for hallucination mitigation have not yet been systematically examined. This survey adopts an application-oriented perspective of capability enhancement to analyze how RAG, reasoning enhancement, and their integration in Agentic Systems mitigate hallucinations. We propose a taxonomy distinguishing knowledge-based and logic-based hallucinations, systematically examine how RAG and reasoning address each, and present a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
