Probing the nonstrange quark star equation of state with compact stars and gravitational waves
Shu-Peng Wang, Zhen-Yan Lu, Zhi-Jun Ma, Rong-Yao Yang, Jian-Feng Xu, Xiangyun Fu

TL;DR
This paper revises the perturbative QCD model to resolve thermodynamic inconsistencies and explores the implications for the maximum mass of up-down quark stars, with relevance to observed compact objects and gravitational wave events.
Contribution
It introduces a new term in the thermodynamic potential density to fix inconsistencies and applies this to constrain quark star properties based on astrophysical observations.
Findings
Maximum mass of $ud$ quark star can reach 2.17 $M_{\u03A9}$ without tidal constraints.
Observed 2.14 $M_{\u03A9}$ pulsar could be an $ud$ quark star.
GW190814's compact object cannot be an $ud$ quark star under the revised model.
Abstract
A recent study shows that incorporating a new term into the thermodynamic potential density, as required by the thermodynamic consistency criterion, can effectively resolve the thermodynamic inconsistency problems of the conventional perturbative QCD model. This additional term plays a crucial role in resolving inconsistencies at relatively low densities and becomes negligible at extremely high densities. Within this revised perturbative QCD model, we find that if we require only that the energy per baryon of up-down () quark matter exceeds 930 MeV so as not to contradict the standard nuclear physics, the maximum mass of an quark star allowed by the revised perturbative QCD model can reach up to 2.17 . From this perspective, the observed 2.14 pulsar PSR J0740+6620 may be an quark star. However, if we further impose the constraint that the tidal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
