Evaluating the Performance of Direct Higher-Order Formulations in Combinatorial Optimization Problems
Kazuki Ikeuchi, Yoshiki Matsuda, Shu Tanaka

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that directly solving higher-order combinatorial optimization problems using a PUBO approach yields better solution quality and stability than traditional QUBO methods, without additional computational costs.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that directly handling higher-order terms improves solution quality in Ising machine-based optimization, avoiding order reduction complexities.
Findings
PUBO solver outperforms QUBO in solution quality and stability
No significant increase in computational time with PUBO approach
Direct higher-order problem solving avoids order-reduction drawbacks
Abstract
Ising machines, including quantum annealing machines, are promising next-generation computers for combinatorial optimization problems. However, due to hardware limitations, most Ising-type hardware can only solve objective functions expressed in linear or quadratic terms of binary variables. Therefore, problems with higher-order terms require an order-reduction process, which increases the number of variables and constraints and may degrade solution quality. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of directly solving such problems without order reduction by using a high-performance simulated annealing-based optimization solver capable of handling polynomial unconstrained binary optimization (PUBO) formulations. We compare its performance against a conventional quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) solver on the same hardware platform. As benchmarks, we use the low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
